These standards apply to public guides, examples, comparison language, and product-preview claims. They distinguish editorial guidance from working product functionality and establish how sources, updates, corrections, accessibility, and AI-assisted drafting should be handled.

How is AI-assisted content handled?

AI may assist with research organization, drafting, or editing, but the publishing team remains responsible for accuracy, originality, source quality, claims, accessibility, and corrections.

Primary sources

Source policy

Use primary authority for claims that depend on an authority

Regulations should point to regulators, standards to standards bodies, platform guidance to the platform, and research claims to the original paper or professional statement where practical.

  • Identify the claim
  • Check source scope
  • Prefer the primary publisher
  • Record review date
  • Avoid citation laundering

Publication policy

Label previews, samples, uncertainty, and updates

Examples are not testimonials. Planned features are not available features. Anticipated tiers are not offers. Material corrections should change the page date and explain the correction when reader understanding could be affected.

  • Preview labels
  • Illustrative sample labels
  • No fabricated social proof
  • Page-level update dates
  • Correction path

Accessibility policy

Make structure and meaning available beyond visual styling

Pages should use meaningful headings, keyboard access, programmatic labels, visible focus, text alternatives, readable contrast, reduced-motion support, and responsive reflow.

  • Semantic structure
  • Keyboard operation
  • Text alternatives
  • Contrast and focus
  • Reflow and reduced motion

Questions

Questions about Editorial Standards for Useful, Verifiable Story Guidance

Who is accountable for a published guide?

The displayed editorial author or team is accountable for the page, including any AI-assisted drafting or research organization.

How can a reader request a correction?

Use the contact page and include the URL, disputed statement, and supporting primary source when available.

Does llms.txt improve Google rankings?

Google states that llms.txt does not affect Google Search or generative-search visibility. It is maintained only as an optional discovery summary.

Why join early access?

Help decide what gets built first.

Tell us your use case and anticipated plan. Your response is research—not a purchase—and will shape the first functional product. Final features, pricing, limits, and timing may change.

  • Register interest in this exact page and audience
  • Prioritize planned workflows and features
  • Receive launch updates and future invite information